Fifty to seventy pages on the one question that decides the project: will this community let you build — and on what terms?
A scored risk assessment with explicit reasoning. You know whether to proceed, with what conditions, and why.
Every key decision-maker profiled: voting history, stated concerns, political cycle, and who influences them.
Named groups, leadership, tactics, activation status, and whether their playbook transfers to your site.
Water rights, noise standards, visual impact mandates, power rates: the non-negotiables independent of political goodwill.
Every comparable project in the jurisdiction: what approval required, what failed, what the opposition argued.
What framing lands, what to avoid, and how to position you as a partner.
Page one of a real Due Diligence Report — the executive summary, anonymized, exactly as it reads on your desk.
Due Diligence Sample ReportCedar Vale County, KYThere is no zoning here and no land-use vote to lose, so nothing stands between the project and construction except the tax deal — and the county has never voted against it. What the county wants in exchange is already itemized, down to fire trucks and ballfields: roughly $61 million up front and $13.1 million a year, in return for cutting the tax bill. Local officials distrust developers on the record and have built the bargain accordingly, with penalties, inspections, and a letter of credit. Nobody needs to like the buyer for this to close.
Anonymized from an actual Due Diligence Report. Place names, people, and organizations are fictional equivalents; findings are as delivered. Officials are described by role.
Ahead of an interconnection deposit, land close, or board approval — when the cost of being wrong is measured in years.
The report tells you what to resolve, who to brief, and what to offer before the application makes your plans public.
Most clients screen with the Flyover first, then commission the full report on sites that clear the screen.
Every consequential claim links to the public record. Analysts review every finding; an independent editor reviews every report.